Medicare wants to change how it pays for emergency ambulance services to give seniors more options besides going to a hospital emergency department, according to officials at HHS, Health and Humans Services, the federal agency the oversees CMS, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid.
“Other options could include going to an urgent care center, a doctor’s office, or even treatment at home under supervision of a doctor via telehealth links
“It’s just a pilot project for now, but if adopted nationwide the idea could save Medicare more than $500 million a year and allow local fire departments and ambulance services to focus the time and energy of first responders on the most serious emergencies…
“Unveiling the ambulance proposal at a Washington, D.C., fire station, Adam Boehler, the innovation center director, said he was astounded to learn that under current rules Medicare will only pay for emergency ambulance services if the patient is going to a hospital, in most cases.
“‘I thought that was a joke,’ said Boehler, a former health care entrepreneur who ran a company providing in-home medical care to seriously ill patients. He called Medicare’s current policy a “ridiculous incentive” to funnel patients to the most high-cost setting. Most private insurance plans discourage emergency room use by imposing higher copays, and some state Medicaid plans are trying similar tactics.
“Appearing at the same event, the chief medical officer for the New York City fire department endorsed Medicare’s experiment. Dr. David Prezant said his agency is overwhelmed with non-emergency calls and transporting patients to a hospital is a time-consuming process that keeps ambulance crews needlessly tied up.
“‘If only 20 percent of our calls no longer required transport to an ED (emergency department), we would save lives in cases when every second counts,’ Prezant said. Associated Press.